Search Results

r other non-risk factors.    Risk Evaluation Process  A High Priority designatio

iews by EFSA.   EFSA’s recent re-evaluation, which considered over 800 new studies

es. They are chosen based on a thorough evaluation process, including document reviews, on

ce with the Act on the Registration and Evaluation of Chemical Substances, the results of

e first submitted to the government for evaluation and are monitored for a period of 5 yea

tablishes a Technical Committee for the Evaluation of Chemical Substances and a Deliberati

ation, must include the name and hazard evaluation details of the new chemical substance a

ng votes.   PET and rPET Quality Evaluation In an effort to ensure consumer safe

he FDA, is a crucial part of the safety evaluation before a product can be approved for ma

of co-formulants must be submitted for evaluation. Confidential information can be sent d

, thereby improving the accuracy of the evaluation of chemical substance evaluations under

cation must include the name and hazard evaluation details of the new chemical substance,

tection Agency (EPA) finalized its risk evaluation of the flame retardant and plasticizer

al Chemical Introduction Scheme (AICIS) Evaluation Statement and focus on managing the use

F systems and in paper production. This evaluation considered the required technical and f

On 27 September 2024, Japan’s Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (MHLW) approved amendments to the Standards and Criteria for Foods, Food Additives. This amendment revises the positive list of food contact materials (FCMs) under the Food Sanita

ion) of the Act on the Registration and Evaluation of Chemical Substances (K-REACH) and Ar

he National Institute of Technology and Evaluation (NITE), 225 chemicals are now classifie

g the list based on scientific data and evaluations. Substances may be added to the Watch

Objectives The REACH (Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemi