Search Results

ion provides the means of registration, evaluation, authorization, and restriction of che

xposure scenarios is essential for risk evaluation. Priority assessment chemicals are s

y haven’t organized a systemic safety evaluation of the ingredients listed.  Though

tiny, authorities have stepped up their evaluation of industrial chemicals under EU legisl

tion Agency (EPA) released a draft risk evaluation for dicyclohexyl phthalate (DCHP) under

rks and tools to facilitate the ongoing evaluation and incorporation of non-animal data an

draft list of substances scheduled for evaluation in 2024 and update their dossiers to in

on Agency (EPA) released its final risk evaluation for diisodecyl phthalate (DIDP), conclu

s actively engaged in the comprehensive evaluation of substances to assess their potential

hanges in classification criteria or re-evaluation of existing data.  

rioritize five toxic chemicals for risk evaluation under the Toxic Substances Control Act

regulation focuses on the registration, evaluation, authorization, and restriction of chem

lds. Methylparaben has undergone safety evaluations by the Scientific Committee for Consum

ine) (MBOCA) CAS RN: 101-14-4) for risk evaluation under the Toxic Substances Control Act

he selection of substances subjected to evaluation, emphasizing their potential impact on

“Chemical Substances Registration and Evaluation Act” and the “Chemical Substances C

l hazards and conduct risk assessments. Evaluation of eye irritation or corrosion is an in

ve ingredients to undergo thorough risk evaluations. The updated draft Emission Scenario D

ency (Anvisa) has revised its pesticide evaluation guidance for mutagenicity, carcinogene

Japan's Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (MHLW) has taken a significant step towards improving transparency and accessibility by releasing an English version of its positive list of substances assessed for safety in food contact materials (FCMs